nexy

Use case

Collect feedback on a document from several people

Send it to five people and get one list back. Each is asked separately, nobody is chased twice, and where they disagree you are told so — instead of five sets of comments you have to reconcile yourself.

Each reader is asked separately, in the chat they already use, with no document system to log into. You get one list back: what more than one of them raised, where they disagreed with each other, and who has not replied yet — and the people who have already answered are never chased again.

What it looks like

Asked separately, so three people spotting the same contradiction means something. Chased once, so nobody gets annoyed.

How to do it

  1. Send the document and say who should read it and by when. They need no account and no document tool.
  2. Each person is asked separately, so their comments are their own rather than an echo of whoever replied first.
  3. Nexy chases once, at a sensible hour, and only the people who have not answered.
  4. You get one list: what several of them raised independently, where they contradict each other, and who is still out.
  5. Disagreements are kept as disagreements. Nothing is merged into an averaged opinion.

Why it works

Separately beats togetherIn a shared thread, the first comment anchors everybody. Asked alone, three people spotting the same contradiction is real evidence.
Chasing once is the right numberZero chases and you get two replies. Three chases and people stop reading anything you send.
Agreement across readers is the signalOne person disliking a paragraph is taste. Three people independently hitting the same contradiction is a defect.
Disagreement is informationTwo readers wanting opposite things about the opening is something you have to decide, not something to average.
Nothing to log intoComments arrive in whatever chat they already use, which is why the person who never opens shared documents actually replies.

Where it stops

It gathers and organises what people said. It does not edit your document.

It will not rewrite it for youYou get the feedback, structured. What to do about it stays your call.
It will not chase foreverOnce. After that it tells you who is outstanding and leaves it to you.
It will not merge contradictionsTwo opposite opinions stay two opposite opinions, attributed.
It does not show readers each other's commentsUnless you say so. That separation is what makes the agreement meaningful.

Questions people ask

How do I collect feedback on a document from several people without chasing them all?

Send it once, say who should read it and by when, and let each person be asked separately in the chat they already use. Nobody logs into a document tool. You get one list back rather than five sets of comments, and the people who have already replied are never asked again — only the ones who have not.

Why ask each person separately instead of in one thread?

Because the first comment in a shared thread anchors everybody who comes after it. Once somebody has said the opening is too long, the next three readers are reacting to that rather than to your document. Asked alone, three people independently hitting the same contradiction on page two is real evidence that something is wrong with page two.

How often does it chase people who have not replied?

Once, at a reasonable hour, and only the people still outstanding. That is a deliberate number: with no chase you get two replies out of five, and with three chases people start ignoring everything you send them. After that one reminder it tells you who is still out and leaves the decision to nudge them with you.

What does the feedback actually look like when it comes back?

One list, in three parts. What more than one reader raised independently, which is the part you should act on first. Where readers disagree with each other, attributed, because that is a decision you have to make rather than an average to compute. And who has not replied yet. Nothing is merged into a single smoothed-out opinion.

Do the readers need a document tool, an account, or a login?

No. The document reaches them and their comments come back through whatever chat they already use. That is usually the difference between four replies and one, because the person who never opens a shared document link will still answer a message. Nothing is installed on their side and nothing is created for them to maintain.

Will it tell me which person said what?

Yes, where it matters. Agreement across readers is reported as agreement, because its value lies in being independent. Disagreements are attributed, because you need to know whose opinion you are weighing. What it does not do is show your readers each other's comments unless you ask for that, since the separation is what makes the whole thing worth doing.

Can it rewrite the document based on the feedback?

No, and it should not. You get the feedback organised so you can see at a glance what is a defect, what is taste, and what is a genuine conflict between two readers. Deciding which of those to act on is the work, and a version where a tool silently resolves five people's opinions into a new draft would hide exactly the information you asked for.

Does this work for things other than documents?

Yes — anything you want several separate opinions on rather than a conversation about. A design, a proposal, a price list, a set of photographs, a job description, a plan. The mechanism is the same: asked separately so the opinions are independent, chased once, and reported with the agreements and the contradictions kept apart.

Related use cases

New here? How Nexy works explains the whole thing in a minute, and the index lists every use case.

Stay posted on Nexy

We add a new use case most days and test what actually works. Get the short version by email, or a notification the moment something ships. No account, and one click to stop.

How to collect feedback on a document from several people at once